Fran’s also suggested Dorey dislapy something to the effect the AVN provides non government information (ie: the other side).So in effect it sounds like Fran is suggesting this victory doesn’t undo the damage Meryl has done in maintaining dishonesty and she should have just complied initially.Another member has replied: Hi Fran I think what you wrote is refreshingly honest. I think that once you have discovered what vaccines really are it would be hard to be prochoice . .Dorey has already misrepresented the judgement as confirming the AVN’s *original* contention re jurisdiction. Get this (srsly): I am just so pleased that the Supreme Court agreed with our original contention that the HCCC had no jurisdiction to investigate us based on the complaints which were not valid complaints according to the HCC Act. Which would mean the original contention was based on complaints not denial of being a health care provider. More dishonesty. Poor Fran.Chuck it on the rewriting history pile.

  1. November 14, 2012 12:44 pm

Fran’s also suggested Dorey dislapy something to the effect the AVN provides non government information (ie: the other side).So in effect it sounds like Fran is suggesting this victory doesn’t undo the damage Meryl has done in maintaining dishonesty and she should have just complied initially.Another member has replied: Hi Fran I think what you wrote is refreshingly honest. I think that once you have discovered what vaccines really are it would be hard to be prochoice . .Dorey has already misrepresented the judgement as confirming the AVN’s *original* contention re jurisdiction. Get this (srsly): I am just so pleased that the Supreme Court agreed with our original contention that the HCCC had no jurisdiction to investigate us based on the complaints which were not valid complaints according to the HCC Act. Which would mean the original contention was based on complaints not denial of being a health care provider. More dishonesty. Poor Fran.Chuck it on the rewriting history pile.



Comments are closed.